|
|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
61 Users Online (59 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Search Gallery
Gallery Favorites
|
For all you non-believers
 |
|
View image full size|||
Not Yet Rated
|
 |
|
Uploaded By: rowlandscha Fri, Apr 18, 2008
|
|
Description: Just wanted to illustrate the drastic differance the Mental Ray engine is. These are the exact same seens rendered with the same settings. The one to the left was done in Revit 2009 (mental ray) and to the right was done using the incredibly inferior Accurender in Revit 2008.
|
Previous Next |
Comments
|
Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:32:38 PM
#1
|
|
active
Joined Tue, Jan 31, 2006
 This user is offline |
is revit 2009 available in the market?
|
|
|
Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:34:25 PM
#2
|
|
active
Joined Fri, Nov 30, 2007
No rating This user is offline |
NICE. I need to get 2009. How long if they take to render?
|
|
|
Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 4:02:59 PM
#3
|
|
active
Joined Sun, Apr 20, 2008
No rating This user is offline |
What a great job Autodesk made integrating MentalRay in Revit. The workflow is still pretty mutch the same, but with mia/shader materials insted. Check out http://www.mentalimages.com/4_1_motion_pictures/index.html and take a look at some motion-picture renderers..... Everytime I get the "hate my software" feeling I try to look at some real pros work. All software incl many freeware 3d/render engines has the power to achive superb result. And a great render-setup will never look great, when the design itself is bad. Great design looks great regardless if it´s Mentalray or lightscape etc.... Anyway. Now I have this great tools, the rest is up to me. Hmm. BTW great indirect light..... Ciao
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2017227 | Objects: | 22947 | Forum Posts: | 152211 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|
Search;){kind=link}