|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
33 Users Online (31 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Forums
Forums >> General Discussion >> Revit Project Management >> 3D Truss Family
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 21, 2011
84 Posts
![5 Stars: 1 Votes](/images/stars_5.gif) |
Hi there,
Currently running Revit 2016 on Windows 10.
Can't seem to find my answer anywhere, so I'm asking here. I have a 3D Truss family which we use for projects mainly to save time drawing them up in sections, etc.
My question is, if this is a structural member, why can't I assign this family to be a "Structural Truss" but only as a "Structural Framing" element. It's just confusing people in the office when they go to add the truss into the project & instead of clicking on the "Structural" tab > "Truss", they have to click on the "Structural" tab > "Beam"
I have checked the properties in the family & I can't find where I can actually assign that family to be a "Structural Truss" family. I've checked the loading procedure too and the family file types do not differ either.
Is the fix that I need to create a new family in a different manner? Or is it a property which I haven't thought of that needs to be changed.
Thanks in advance.
|
This user is offline |
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
|
active
Joined: Thu, Feb 18, 2016
0 Posts
![3.5 Stars: 4 Votes](/images/stars_3.5.gif) |
i think the only way that could happen that your family doesn't fall under structrual trusses category , i think you will have to recreate your family under structural trusses template
|
This user is offline |
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 21, 2011
84 Posts
![5 Stars: 1 Votes](/images/stars_5.gif) |
Thanks for that, I thought that would be the case. Just wasn't sure if there was an easier fix.
|
This user is offline |
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
active
Joined: Thu, Feb 18, 2016
0 Posts
![3.5 Stars: 4 Votes](/images/stars_3.5.gif) |
just keep using it as a beam would be the best way :D
|
This user is offline |
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 21, 2011
84 Posts
![5 Stars: 1 Votes](/images/stars_5.gif) |
Is it better to keep it as a beam for project management? Or Revit properties?
|
This user is offline |
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
![](images/spacer.gif) |
Similar Threads |
Truss overhang help |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:32:23 AM
|
3
|
Problem with Truss Family |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:34:32 AM
|
5
|
Truss family |
General Discussion >> Revit Project Management
|
Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:20:05 PM
|
3
|
Truss steel system family creation |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:27:52 PM
|
3
|
TRUSS FAMILY diagonal webs |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:26:51 AM
|
1
|
![](images/spacer.gif) |
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2025982 | Objects: | 22991 | Forum Posts: | 152208 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|