|
|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
58 Users Online (57 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Forums
|
Forums >> Community >> The Studio >> MArch Vs. BArch
|
|
|
admin
Joined: Sun, Jan 19, 2003
568 Posts
 |
Hey all,
wanted to get a discussion going about the MArch degree verses the BArch degree in architectural schools across the country.
I graduated in may 2003, with a BArch degree from Tulane University. However, my school is one of those progressive schools that is switching over to the 5 year MArch degree. The class after us will be the first class to receive this disagree. As you can probably imagine, there was a big stink about it from our class. Virtually the same curriculum with a better looking degree... Anyhow, the school decided to award our class with a retroactive MArch degree in one year when the class of 2004 receives theirs.
What does everyone else think about this issue?
-----------------------------------
Hiroshi Jacobs
The Catholic University of America |
This user is offline |
View Website
|
 | |
|
|
active
Joined: Fri, Jul 18, 2003
40 Posts
No Rating |
As long as you didn't have to pay for it. What about the class that came before you?
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
admin
Joined: Sun, Jan 19, 2003
568 Posts
|
The retroactive degree will be available to all previous classes that graduated with the 5yr bachelor's degree I believe....I think that takes it back to some time in the 70's.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Jun 30, 2003
41 Posts
 |
I can't believe the schools are doing this - that's nuts. It should have been left alone. I went to Louisiana Tech and graduated in 1990 with a BArch. Tulane is a beautiful place and a fine school. I worked with one of the great architects that graduated from there many many years ago. I just can't see the sense in giving away a Masters degree that way. But maybe they saw the folly in offering a 6 year Masters when all it meant was that the student did one more year of hell for a degree that was for all purposes the same as the 5 year, except with a Masters you can teach at the University level with more credibility.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
admin
Joined: Sun, Jan 19, 2003
568 Posts
|
I think they did it because they felt that the amount of work done in that 5 years was deserving of a master's degree. In my 5 years there at Tulane, I averaged 18 credit hour semesters. Couple that with ,as we all know, time consuming Studio and that's a lot of work!
-----------------------------------
Hiroshi Jacobs
The Catholic University of America |
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
|
Stair Break Line Customization |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:20:09 AM
|
0
|
|
Revit 2014, any news? |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:27:18 AM
|
0
|
|
Revit 2013 changes...? |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:08:58 PM
|
0
|
|
Daylighting Analysis Help-Revit into 3DS Max |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:27:31 PM
|
0
|
|
PAD IMPROVEMENT |
General Discussion >> Wishlist
|
Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:13:01 PM
|
0
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2056942 | Objects: | 23074 | Forum Posts: | 152249 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|
Search