RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

38 Users Online (37 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks >> Eureka! Much faster rending made easy-peasy...

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |

Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:07:02 AM | Eureka! Much faster rending made easy-peasy...

#1

Revin


active

Joined: Tue, Sep 15, 2009
26 Posts
No Rating


Hi all,

I've been playing around with the Revit 2011 rendering capabilities, and found a way to render images (in same good quality) in less than half the time it usually takes.

Usually, to render a specific image at 300 DPI at "Best" level would take my pc about 2hrs to accomplish (for example).

I've found that by selecting the view's crop-region, then enlarging the crop-region to (eg.) 5m wide; then rendering the view at 75dpi, would take about 30 minutes flat. The rendered image would be huge (in physical size), and when printed out on A4 size (or scaled down in Photoshop), the pixelations dissappear almost completely. I get the same image quality as the 300dpi rendering, but at a fraction of the rendering time.

Cheers!


This user is offline

 

Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:17:42 PM | Eureka! Much faster rending made easy-peasy...

#2

itsmyalterego


active
itsmyalterego Avatar

Joined: Thu, May 28, 2009
829 Posts
4 Stars: 16 Votes


What matters most is the total number of pixels.   DPI is an arbitrary number -- It's how many of those pixels there are per inch, and the image density is only important when scaling it to fit a piece of paper, or a monitor. 

 

I would stay away from "best" quality renderings.  The quality settings only adjust factors like the softness of shadows, the number of refractions and reflections, and other soft lighting calculations that take up an immense amount of processing.   Generally, I stick to medium quality renders at over 4000 pixels for any image I intend to print on 11x17 or smaller, and I'll bump it up to ~10,000px horizontally for a poster.

 

Medium quality light looks pretty good, in my opinion, as long as you get enough resolution. 


This user is offline

 

Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:46:12 AM | Eureka! Much faster rending made easy-peasy...

#3

Revin


active

Joined: Tue, Sep 15, 2009
26 Posts
No Rating


The renderings I'm busy with is for a television-production, and the clients thus needs the images to be in the highest resolution possible, hence the "Best" setting I'm going with.

But you're right; for images to be printed, the "medium" setting suffices.


This user is offline

 

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 1 |



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

How the heck can I get line styles to Families?

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:31:44 AM

0

Shortcuts to views in project browser?

Community >> Newbies

Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:00:20 PM

2

Render times

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:00:20 AM

0

Transparent Trees

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 9:16:28 PM

1

Schedule Count Parameter

Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks

Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:02:10 AM

0

Site Stats

Members:

2066343

Objects:

23085

Forum Posts:

152255

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 0.5261

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights