|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
38 Users Online (37 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Forums
Forums >> Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks >> Eureka! Much faster rending made easy-peasy...
|
|
active
Joined: Tue, Sep 15, 2009
26 Posts No Rating |
Hi all,
I've been playing around with the Revit 2011 rendering capabilities, and found a way to render images (in same good quality) in less than half the time it usually takes.
Usually, to render a specific image at 300 DPI at "Best" level would take my pc about 2hrs to accomplish (for example).
I've found that by selecting the view's crop-region, then enlarging the crop-region to (eg.) 5m wide; then rendering the view at 75dpi, would take about 30 minutes flat. The rendered image would be huge (in physical size), and when printed out on A4 size (or scaled down in Photoshop), the pixelations dissappear almost completely. I get the same image quality as the 300dpi rendering, but at a fraction of the rendering time.
Cheers!
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
active
Joined: Thu, May 28, 2009
829 Posts
|
What matters most is the total number of pixels. DPI is an arbitrary number -- It's how many of those pixels there are per inch, and the image density is only important when scaling it to fit a piece of paper, or a monitor.
I would stay away from "best" quality renderings. The quality settings only adjust factors like the softness of shadows, the number of refractions and reflections, and other soft lighting calculations that take up an immense amount of processing. Generally, I stick to medium quality renders at over 4000 pixels for any image I intend to print on 11x17 or smaller, and I'll bump it up to ~10,000px horizontally for a poster.
Medium quality light looks pretty good, in my opinion, as long as you get enough resolution.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
active
Joined: Tue, Sep 15, 2009
26 Posts No Rating |
The renderings I'm busy with is for a television-production, and the clients thus needs the images to be in the highest resolution possible, hence the "Best" setting I'm going with.
But you're right; for images to be printed, the "medium" setting suffices.
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
How the heck can I get line styles to Families? |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:31:44 AM
|
0
|
Shortcuts to views in project browser? |
Community >> Newbies
|
Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:00:20 PM
|
2
|
Render times |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:00:20 AM
|
0
|
Transparent Trees |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 9:16:28 PM
|
1
|
Schedule Count Parameter |
Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks
|
Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:02:10 AM
|
0
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2066343 | Objects: | 23085 | Forum Posts: | 152255 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|