|
|
Home | Forums |
Downloads | Gallery |
News & Articles | Resources |
Jobs | FAQ |
| Join |
Welcome !
|
84 Users Online (83 Members):
Show Users Online
- Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM |
Forums
Forums >> Revit Structure >> Technical Support >> revit latest version cannot be save to a lower version
|
|
active
Joined: Wed, Feb 4, 2009
1 Posts
|
hi, just wondering why is there a lower version file type when saving in a higher version of revit. Cause I found out that when i worked in a Revit 2010 and tried to open it in revit 2009 its not possible.Can anyone help me about this problem please thanks. Onyx
|
This user is offline |
|
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
|
Read the similar threads below: | | \ /
|
This user is offline |
|
|
site moderator|||
Joined: Fri, Feb 10, 2006
1874 Posts
|
this is not a problem, this is the way of Revit.
-----------------------------------
best regards, coreed,aia bmpArchitects,Inc. "Revit has to be implemented, Not installed." Long Live Revit |
This user is offline |
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Feb 18, 2008
251 Posts
|
This is also called a profit center for Autodesk. If you want to collaborate and use the latest families, Subscription is the only real answer. Like it or not.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
active
Joined: Sun, Apr 25, 2004
1207 Posts
|
The real issue of not being able to save backwards to older versions of Revit has never been about profit or creating user frustration. Instead it is about trying to take an updated database schema with new relationships between objects and trying to throw away and orphan objects in the 2010 database schema to conform to an older database schema. If I created a database in MS Access called Tom.mdb and then decided to enhance it to Tom 2.mdb by adding all sorts of new tables, fields and relationships I cannot save Tom 2.mdb to the old Tom.mdb format without losing all the new stuff and possibly breaking the entire thing. Even if both are done in the same version of Access. It is the same with Revit which should be looked at as a database that happens to be able to do architectural graphic views/reports. Personally the thing that made me understand Revit so well was the fact that I have been using databases for 25 plus years and have taken college level courses in database management.
-----------------------------------
Tom www.reviteer.com http://twitter.com/Reviteer |
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
active
Joined: Mon, Oct 3, 2005
31 Posts
|
Please Tom. Let's not make excuses for AutoDesk. The technical complexity of reverse compatibility is no reason that it should not be a feature of Revit, especially since XML and other share-based data formats have been around for years. Also, you reference Access, a Microsoft product that is not only uber-proprietary but the offspring of one of the most controlling and license-paranoid companies in history. The bar should be a little higher than that. Access sucks anyway and MySQL is a better example of a data architecture that is both robust and open source.
Personally, I'm just waiting for Google to get into the BIM game with Sketchup which you know will end this discussion once and for all.
|
This user is offline |
View Website
|
|
|
Similar Threads |
Deposition to a lower version |
Revit Structure >> Technical Support
|
Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:01:38 AM
|
3
|
save the file in in version above???? |
General Discussion >> Revit Project Management
|
Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:57:52 AM
|
1
|
Defpoints in latest version of Revit? |
Revit Building >> Technical Support
|
Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 2:08:38 PM
|
1
|
can a revit 9.1 file save down to a previous version of revit? |
Community >> The Studio
|
Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:53:59 AM
|
1
|
Origin of the word Revit? And how do "save as" to older version of Revit? |
Community >> Newbies
|
Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:20:30 AM
|
5
|
|
|
Site Stats
Members: | 2056445 | Objects: | 23069 | Forum Posts: | 152325 | Job Listings: | 3 |
|