RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

72 Users Online (70 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> Revit Building >> Technical Support >> Revit 2010 Stability

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 5 of 5 | << Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:44:27 AM | Revit 2010 Stability

#61

alabaster2513


active
alabaster2513 Avatar

Joined: Tue, Jan 16, 2007
1009 Posts
3.5 Stars: 25 Votes


Winking i try. i do often opologize for being a jerk, but you really really need to have hardware thats on par with the needs of the software. hardware is money but TIME is money and from a people who are successful in BIM usually have the hardware.

This user is offline

View Website

Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:09:18 AM | Revit 2010 Stability

#62

EspenMA


active

Joined: Fri, Dec 14, 2007
3 Posts
No Rating


Its been crashing with different drivers, lastly on 197.59 for Quadro. The graphics card is a FX 1500, so it should be good for Revit 2010. The first time we experienced this problem was on a GeForce 6800 XT with 128 MB RAM (thats why I tested the amount of RAM in use with GPU-Z).

Revit 2010 doesn't need a CAD card to run fluently with 3D-acceleration (Radeon 3450 is just as fast as FX 3400. Go figure). When we upgrade, it will be with Radeons or GeForces with 512 - 1024 MB of RAM.

Thanks for the replies. I didn't notice until later that it was an old thread.


This user is offline

 

Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:35:19 AM | Revit 2010 Stability

#63

BubbaZanetti


active

Joined: Tue, Jun 23, 2009
9 Posts
No Rating


Here's an update of our progress:

 Revit likes big duo cores. It prefers a 3.4 Ghz Duo Processor to a 1.6 Quad-core for example.

Revit likes a 64-bit OS, 8GB RAM minimum and the pagefile needs to be insane-sized like 20,000 mb.

Set this up and you should be fine. As for particular graphics cards, it REALLY varies a lot. But as long as you have these bare minimums in place Revit should be able to throw around some pretty big models.


This user is offline

 

Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:19:41 PM | Revit 2010 Stability

#64

Mitsunobu


active
Mitsunobu Avatar

Joined: Thu, May 31, 2007
7 Posts
3 Stars: 2 Votes


<a jerk>

 

yes I was.

     I was doing the work of an entire team by myself from a small firm that wouldn't listen to any software or hardware requirements I gave them, and following the upgrade standards set by a firm the size that could handle this style of infrastructure...

 I was way too stressed and took it out on the RevitCity boards. I apologize for being such a jerk.

 

<sorry> 


This user is offline

 

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 5 of 5 | << Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

Revit 2010 [ 1 2 3 ]

General Discussion >> Revit ROI

Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 4:42:36 PM

35

Web Update for Revit

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:30:17 AM

0

Revit 2017: object placement stability

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:13:29 AM

4

Opening a 2010 file in 2009

Revit Structure >> Technical Support

Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:51:56 AM

3

2010 classic [ 1 2 3 4 5 ]

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:25:30 AM

71

Site Stats

Members:

2057494

Objects:

23074

Forum Posts:

152250

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 1.6178

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights