RevitCity.com Logo

Home  |  Forums  |  Downloads  |  Gallery  |  News & Articles  |  Resources  |  Jobs  |  FAQ  |  SearchSearch  |  Join  |  LoginLogin

Welcome !

57 Users Online (56 Members): Show Users Online - Most ever was 626 - Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:00:17 PM

 

Forums

Forums >> Revit Building >> Tips & Tricks >> Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 Next >>

Tue, Mar 6, 2007 at 9:28:37 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#1

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


I'm very familiar with Sketchup and it's abilities.  I would like to build some things (not buildings) in 3D in Revit to use as components.  What's the best way to go about this?  I've looked at the included tutorials and they're not much help (nor is the online help file).  Is it possible/worthwhile to build these in Revit...they don't need to be parametric, mostly just objects.

Or, is it better to use something like Sketchup and import into Revit as a 3D object?  Revit's viewing controls are not very good compared to other software (particularly software designed for 3D viewing).

Any advice/help/suggestions/locations of tutorials would be greatly appreciated.

TIA...


This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 1:13:48 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#2

Enginator


active

Joined: Wed, Feb 21, 2007
40 Posts
5 Stars: 2 Votes


I'm kind of a newbie to revit, but IMO, if you don't need the objects to be parametric, revit isn't necessary.  That said, i seem to have an easier time understanding how to model something in revit than sketchup or 3dmax for some reason.  

 

To learn about how to do it in revit, go through the tutorial on families.  It really isn't that hard.  Now if you want to do compex surfaces, I haven't figured that out in revit, and I'm not sure if it is even possible.

 

Good luck! 


This user is offline

 

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 8:33:34 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#3

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


If you plan on using the 3d stuff in Revit I would build it in Revit. It is just as easy and gives you the control over the display, rendering, and future parametric needs. I can't tell you how many time I built something and then came back and updated it with some parametric controls.


-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 8:41:18 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#4

coreed


site moderator|||
coreed Avatar

Joined: Fri, Feb 10, 2006
1874 Posts
4 Stars: 16 Votes


i totally agree with robinballew 100%

HTH


-----------------------------------

best regards,

coreed,aia

bmpArchitects,Inc.

"Revit has to be implemented, Not installed." 

Long Live Revit

This user is offline

 

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 11:20:27 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#5

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


Having used 3D Studio, Sketchup and other programs (HOK's drawVision), I've found the Revit 3D interface to be klunky at best.  I'm used to being able to quickly and simply maniuplate the views-- at which Revit falls flat, and build surfaces quickly.

The tutorials that come with haven't been particularly helpful.  What other resources are there for building stuff?  I understand the desire to build it all in Revit, but Revit's 3D tools are lacking, IMHO.  This doesn't take away from the "architectural" side of things, only the "build object" side of things. 


This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 11:30:55 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#6

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


I guess more information on what you are trying to model. I realize some complex shapes with curves in multiple directions are hard to do in Revit but I have also used multiple softwares to model things and Revit is a easy as any once you get the hang of it. How much stuff have you tried to create?

-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 11:42:38 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#7

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


For now, it's a steeple.  No curves, but angled parts/pieces.  I don't want to build the interior structure, since it's not our scope of work, only what it looks like, which is our scope of work.  It's make out of aluminum sheets on an aluminum frame.

Again, I'm used to face modeling in programs like sketchup, not "solids" modeling, which seems to be closer to what Revit does. 


This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 11:57:57 AM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#8

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


My first instinct is to use the roof tool inside Revit not model in separate.


-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 12:08:10 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#9

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


We do a lot of this type of church with a steeple, so we'd like it as component we can just drag and drop in.  Also, it's complicated enough that I don't think the roof tool will work, but maybe.

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 12:17:23 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#10

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


 

Just a thought...Do you think there are people or Companies that would pay for custom Revit Families? I have been using Revit from v.2 and can create about anything in a fairly short time period.


-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 12:21:18 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#11

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


Maybe.

The problem is standards.  We like our stuff the way we like it.  Also, by not creating it ourselves, we have less understanding about the item.  One of the reasons we create our own content is to know our own content.  If pay somebody else to do it, then 1)  we don't know how to do it ourselves, and 2) we may not have it created to our standards (and yes, I know you can impose standards on an item, but there will be issues), and 3) we won't know enough about it to modify it down the road.

We wouldn't do it... but others might. 


This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 12:28:46 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#12

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


All good points. I guess that's why I creat all my own stuff too. Thanks....


-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 1:09:44 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#13

WWHub


site moderator|||

Joined: Tue, May 16, 2006
13079 Posts
3.5 Stars: 395 Votes


If you don't care about cutting sections through the item or how it's built then go ahead and model it isn sketchup - xport to autocad and pull it into REVIT ....

 

But of course the question then is - why are you using REVIT at all?

 

My suggestion is to learn how to build the family in REVIT.  3D poly-meshes are a problem in REVIT.  So far, I've modeled those in AutoCAD and pulled them in. 


This user is offline

 

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 1:11:57 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#14

robinballew


active
robinballew Avatar

Joined: Sun, Nov 27, 2005
298 Posts
3 Stars: 4 Votes


Side comment. If you model it in SketchUP just import in SketchUP. No need to export to DWG/DXF.

-----------------------------------
BallewDesigns.com

This user is offline

View Website

Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 1:27:20 PM | Best way to build stuff (not "buildings")?

#15

hirsp1


active
hirsp1 Avatar

Joined: Sat, Oct 23, 2004
16 Posts
No Rating


Not a problem...

...but will it cause any issues down the road?  Again, I'm talking about items that will, for the most part, not be parametric. 


This user is offline

View Website

Search this ThreadSearch this Thread | Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 Next >>



Similar Threads

Thread/Thread Starter

Forum

Last Post

Replies

changing the "family" and "type" names

Revit Structure >> Technical Support

Mon, Apr 2, 2007 at 5:33:49 PM

3

Door Schedule Filter Revit 2009

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:21:29 AM

2

One Site. Several Buildings

Revit Structure >> Technical Support

Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:45:09 AM

1

"Moving" a building [ 1 2 3 ]

Revit Building >> Technical Support

Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:48:47 AM

33

Using Revit for existing historic buildings

Community >> The Studio

Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 12:11:25 PM

12

Site Stats

Members:

2056839

Objects:

23074

Forum Posts:

152249

Job Listings:

3

Sponsored Ads

Home | Forums | Downloads | Gallery | News & Articles | Resources | Jobs | Search | Advertise | About RevitCity.com | Link To Us | Site Map | Member List | Firm List | Contact Us

Copyright 2003-2010 Pierced Media LC, a design company. All Rights Reserved.

Page generation time: 5.2238

Login

User Name:

Password:

Remember Me  

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Advanced Search

Search Forums

Advanced Search


Clear Highlights


Clear Highlights